Dr.
V.N. Bhatia, a long-time professor at Washington State University
and an
widely recognized pioneer in
international education, died on Thursday, Jan. 16, 2003. He is survived
by Ursula, his wife of 51 years; a son, Peter, and daughter-in-law,
Liz Dahl, of Portland; a daughter, Robin, of Spokane, and two grandchildren,
Megan, 17, and J.P. 13, both of Portland.
Dr.
Bhatia is remembered at Washington State University through the annual
V.N. Bhatia Lecture on Excellence In Education, a 10-year-old
endowed lecture series that annually brings a major speaker to Pullman.
The
family asks remembrances be sent to the V.N. Bhatia Lecture Fund,
P.O. Box 642012, Pullman, Wash. 99164-2012
Obit
by the Bhatia family
VISHNU
NARAIN BHATIA,
a 47-year member of the faculty at Washington State University,
and an internationally recognized pioneer in building education
opportunities for American students abroad and foreign students
in the United States, died Thursday, Jan. 16, 2003, in Pullman,
Wash.
Vishnu
Narain Bhatia (extreme right) with his son, Peter, daughter-in-law
Liz and grandchildren Meghan and J.P.
Dr.
Bhatia, a native of India, was much honored and revered for his
contributions to higher education and WSU, including a knighthood
from Denmark in 1990 for his decades-long work building ties between
the Scandinavian nation and Washington State. He is also widely
remembered as the primary architect of
Washington State's university-wide honors program that has touched
thousands of students, many of them personally counseled by him.
Dr.
Bhatia, 78, was born Aug. 2, 1924, in Lucknow, India, the youngest
of seven children. He was the only sibling to leave India and the
last of his brothers and sisters to die.
He
came to the United States in 1947 -- a rarity at the time --coincidental
to the partition of India and Pakistan and after earning a bachelor's
degree in pharmacy at Banaras Hindu University. He sailed from Bombay,
stopped in Hawaii and landed in Berkeley, after sailing through
the Golden Gate. He spent his first night in America at the International
House at the University of California at Berkeley, then took a train
to the University of Iowa, where he began his Ph.D. studies.
At
Iowa, on a YMCA field trip, he met Ursula Dawson, an undergrad and
daughter of the university's engineering dean. They married in Bombay
in 1951 after Dr. Bhatia completed his Ph.D. in pharmacy. Not long
thereafter, sensing greater opportunity in the United States, the
young couple returned to this country -- without a job. But he was
soon offered an assistant professorship at Washington State. Pullman
has been the Bhatias' home every since.
Dr.
Bhatia, known to a generation in Pullman as "Vic," was
on the faculty of the College of Pharmacy for 41 years, but made
his greatest impact in leading the Honors Program as its director
for more than 28 years, from 1964 to 1993, and as the university's
International Education director from 1973 until 1990. The Honors
Program under Dr. Bhatia -- he told a WSU publication that he defined
the program as preparing students to become "active and thoughtful
citizens, capable of assuming leadership roles in their professions
and communities" -- won national praise, including an article
in the New York Times. Admission to the program was by invitation
only and usually drew about 600 students with high school GPAs of
3.8 or better who took an honors curriculum in addition to their
major.
"He
(Bhatia) is a remarkable, gifted and caring man who has personally
influenced a generation of WSU Honors undergraduates. I think his
legacy will endure through those gifted graduates," a former
student said in a WSU publication upon Dr. Bhatia's retirement from
Honors.His duties in international education led him to travel the
world on behalf of Washington State, setting up exchange programs
(eventually to number more than 30) and negotiating opportunities
to spread the university's expertise worldwide. He developed a particular
fondness and expertise for Denmark -- which included learning Danish
-- that led to a steady flow back and forth of students between
the two nations. His travels for WSU took him all over Europe, to
China and Japan, to South America and the Middle East, and allowed
him to stay close to his family in India.
As
he wound down his career, he served from 1991-98 as a special assistant
to WSU President Sam Smith, serving in a variety of capacities that
included helping to build alumni connections with overseas graduates
of WSU. His
list of professional activities and consultant work for other university
honors programs and international education efforts runs for pages.
He was president of the National Collegiate Honors Council in the
late '60s and served on its executive committee until 1983. He served
17 years on the executive committee of the Association of International
Education Administrators. He was editor of the national Forum for
Honors for nine years and the International Education Forum for
12. He published more than 70 research and other publications during
his career, including numerous pharmaceutical research studies early
in his career as a doctoral student and in Pullman, and was the
recipient of 18 research grants from various sources. He served
on more than 20 university committees.
Dr.
Bhatia is remembered at Washington State through the annual V.N.
Bhatia Lecture on Excellence In Education, a 10-year-old endowed
lecture series that annually brings a major speaker to Pullman.
He
is survived by Ursula, his wife of 51 years; a son, Peter, and daughter-in-law,
Liz Dahl, of Portland; a daughter, Robin, of Spokane, and two grandchildren,
Megan, 17, and J.P. 13, both of Portland.
A memorial
gathering will be held at a date to be determined. The family asks
remembrances be sent to the V.N. Bhatia Lecture Fund, P.O. Box 642012,
Pullman, Wash. 99164-2012
Essay
by Peter Bhatia Executive editor, The Oregonian
HE'S
NOT SO tall anymore, at least in physical stature. But even at 74,
with pace slower, heart failing, diabetes swirling and memory wobbling,
he still is the Empire State Building to me. The passing decades
may have taken away some of his imperial bearing, may have eliminated
the necessity for the crisp, dark, hand-tailored Hong Kong suits
and the perfectly tied (double Windsor knot, of course) single-color
ties, but he is still the epitome of class, intellectual rigor and
doing the right thing.
He
is my father, Vishnu Narain Bhatia. Named for a Hindu god. It seems
he doesn't have long until he meets his God. For what he has meant
and done for me, I thank God, whatever his name.
He
came to this country in 1947, about the time of the partition of
India and Pakistan, to get a PhD at the University of Iowa, an adventure
unheard of at the time. Before, everyone in his family had been
educated in England. But the British were leaving India and as the
last of seven children his fate was determined more by older sisters
than his parents.
Old
photos showed him at 6-foot-1, all arms and legs -- and there were
the ears, sticking out it seemed about a foot, big enough to make
Dumbo proud. His college travels turned out to be all the more unusual:
He returned to India with his degree and an American fiancé he had
met on a bus in 1949 on the way to a YMCA/YWCA leadership retreat.
They
were married in Bombay in 1951 and he went to work as a pharmaceutical
researcher. There isn't much conversation about those days anymore,
but it is clear that the dark-skinned Indian and the strawberry-blonde
native of Chicago had a difficult time in an India that had just
gained its independence from the light-skinned Brits.
They
returned to the United States, settling in the first place he got
an offer -- Pullman, Washington. I was born a year later in 1953.
My sister arrived in 1955.
My
childhood wasn't full of talk about the way to behave, an approach
to school or a philosophy toward life. The direct conversations
tended to be more like "Take out the garbage," "Go mow the lawn,"
or the more common, "Stop beating your sister." I often felt like
a replacement for the servants he grew up with.
But
the lessons by example were always there and even though the hugs
weren't always plentiful and the praise was sometimes spare, compassion
was never far below the surface. Often, it seemed masked under the
drive that led him to work 45 years for the same institution, Washington
State University.
He
still works today, a trusted adviser to the school's president.
The values of decency, making a difference, caring about people
and suffering fools poorly, they haven't changed a bit. Nor has
the goofy sense of humor. This scholarly man, this icon of academia
still sends me off to the bathroom with the salutation, "Don't fall
in!"
He
prospered in the most political of worlds, where those high-minded
intellectuals throw multi-syllabic knives at each other daily. He
endured through the years with an unbowed attitude, always staying
above the fray, never letting the a101010* get to him (though he
would never utter that word), reflecting a stiff upper lip that
even the British would admire.
His
commitment to education and the excellence he brought to it won
the respect of all and advanced him to a remarkable position as
director of international education. It allowed him to travel around
the world on university business and gave him the opportunity to
touch many, many lives.
In
all he has accomplished and in the manner he has done so, he is
a perfect role model, teaching me lesson after lesson in the value
of hard work, leadership by example, do your job better than anyone
before or since.
Growing
up in Pullman wasn't difficult duty, despite having to take out
the garbage all the time, and I look back on it with a fondness
filled with anecdotes that in the light of adulthood take on important
meanings:
My
earliest memory dates to about kindergarten. We were watching a
football game one day on TV. Black and white, of course. Mom left
for the store. I declined to go along. Then the game ended. I roared
out the front door as only a five-year-old can, chasing mom's car
down the street. He followed, legs and ears surely flapping, causing
quite an uproar in our little neighborhood.
He
chased me down, laughing (although that may be wishful thinking)
with some embarrassment as the neighbor cop, who was always out
washing his patrol car, looked on disapprovingly. This day was the
first of many times he saved me from myself.
About
age 10, I came to understand the concept of death. No particular
incident set me off. Just brain cells turning on. I couldn't sleep.
My insides were churning. Some day we die and that's it, and then
time goes on forever without me, I reasoned. He came to my rescue
then, too, spending what seemed the whole night but probably no
more than 15 minutes, counseling, explaining, emphasizing the importance
of the time we do have on earth.
Through
the whole conversation, sitting on the foot of the bed, he was rubbing
my feet, talking calmly, calmingly, rationally, thoughtfully. But
the message was ultimately one of purpose, one of love, of guidance,
of coaching, and one I haven't forgotten.
On
Friday nights during my pre-adolescence, he and his buddies from
intellectual-land got together over Scotch and cigars to talk and
end the week in style. These were obnoxiously smart guys and they
hypothesized, pontificated and dissected the issues of the day.
I sat on the fireplace hearth and just listened. JFK was a hero.
Civil rights were a necessity. LBJ was a buffoon, though he was
our buffoon.
Those
missiles in Cuba? Hell, yes, we had to blockade. And what a disgrace
it was the lengths the university went to keep those football players
in school. Here was the cure for every problem at the university,
for society.
It
was a wonderful education, although I came to realize they really
were full of it on some of the issues. Above it all, he sat, in
the blue chair in the corner, debating with surety, arguing with
reason, confident without reservation. Again, there were the lessons.
Reason through a situation, argue your point with passion. Even
if you lose (and even though you're never wrong), say what the hell,
and move on.
That
hearth and blue chair were the scene of what he considers the most
memorable conversation of my childhood. He decided it was time for
the birds-and-the-bees talk. He gave me all the gory details. Throughout,
I kept asking, "Can I go out and play now?" When he finished, he
asked if I had any questions. "Yes, I said, can I go out and play
now?"
But
a week later I was back with a question. Sitting on the hearth.
Him in the blue chair. Good, he thought, some of this has sunk in.
"Dad, I asked, did President Kennedy have to do that to Mrs Kennedy
to have a baby?" "Yes, he said, that's what we were talking about."
"Yuck," I said, and went outside to play. No great lessons in this
story, but it is his favorite.
I am
sure that the thoroughly American teenager I became was a puzzling
animal for a son of India, even though like many immigrants he became
more "American than Americans". He Anglicized his name to "Vic,"
and I recall him recruiting me to distribute campaign brochures
for Scoop Jackson after he became a precinct committeeman. He bought
me my first car when I was 16 -- showing remarkable and unspoken
trust -- a '63 Chevy Bel Air that my wife remembers well.
He
tolerated my love of sports, taking me to football games in Spokane
though he didn't give a damn, a tradition we re-enacted for the
first time in 28 years this past New Year's Day when we attended
the Rose Bowl together. He also taught me golf, secretly delighting
when I beat him when I was about 15.
He
used to sneak into my high-school football games, not telling me
he was there, partly because he didn't want to put pressure on me,
partly because he didn't want anyone to know he was really attending
-- gad -- a high-school football game.
He
let me negotiate my own way through school, saying little and tolerating
the facial hair, the tank tops, the bellbottoms, the Beatles and
even, later, buying me beer. At the time, of course, I missed the
larger notion of giving me rope, but controlling the length so I
couldn't get into much trouble.
There
were never any lectures about getting good grades. But the expectations
from the good professor were crystal clear. A's were expected; anything
less was a failure. I vividly recall bringing home my first B, in
sophomore English. From Mrs Hastings. Who used to write "trite"
all over my English papers. I still hate Mrs Hastings -- my first
experience with an editor.
Fortunately,
he took it well, being a scientist and not caring too much about
good writing. The B in chemistry junior year was a little tougher
to explain, but the support was unbending. It helped that I got
an A in the second semester.
He
didn't give me many orders in those days -- they say I wasn't much
trouble -- until it came time for college. Once again, he saved
me from myself, ordering me out of the college town that had been
my home for 18 years and to Stanford. It is probably the single-most
important thing he ever did for me, opening up a world of possibilities
I'd never dreamed of. Nor did he push me in any career direction.
That his son became a journalist was a surprise to the scientist,
but never met with disapproval, especially when it brought me home
to start my career in Spokane.
Through
adulthood, our relationship has changed and matured. We talk about
career, though he never gives me advice because he doesn't know
the newspaper business (though he does know newspapers) and because
he foolishly believes I'm grown up.
There
have been some eerie parallels in our careers, like the time we
both had female subordinates having affairs with our male bosses.
The conversations went something like: "What are you going to do
about it."
"There's
nothing I can do."
"You?"
"There's
nothing I can do either."
Fortunately,
both situations passed.
Perhaps
the most important change has occurred in the last decade, after
he suffered a heart attack while on business in Japan. He didn't
want to go to a Japanese hospital, opting instead to continue his
trip and fly from Tokyo to Los Angeles to Austin. A friend took
one look at him and got him to a hospital in Austin. He had a quadruple
bypass about a week later in Spokane.
I lived
in Dallas at the time. I found out the day after he arrived in Austin.
It was the first time I lost my temper with him since leaving for
college. Jesus Christ, Dad! What the hell were you thinking?
I didn't
realize it then, but that day our relationship entered a new and
inevitably final stage. He's gotten old, I've said to my wife over
and over. He knows. I see it. We spend much of our time together
now talking about my responsibilities when he's gone.
I lecture
him in ways he never did me about slowing down, relaxing, taking
it easy. He protests less now. The conversation doesn't center anymore
on "I'll die if I don't work." Now, it just centers on dying. Just
a few weeks ago, we talked about whether I should take his ashes
back to India to be scattered.
"I
don't know. You decide," he said. Now he's the one sitting on the
hearth, and I'm the one sitting in the blue chair.
Now
I'm the designated adult.
Color
me dense, but I have just realized the fundamental shift in our
relationship. This man who gave me everything -- from my Type A
behavior, to my love of curry, to my insistence on wearing suits
on casual Fridays, to building a code of conduct and morality that
informs every decision I make -- needs me to carry on. Now, perhaps,
it is my turn to rub his feet.